Brandon et al. (2014) (Department for Education (publishing.service.gov.uk)) suggest on pages 8-10:
The harm of neglect
Neglect is considered to be at least as damaging, if not more so, than other forms of maltreatment because its impact is the most far-reaching and difficult to overcome (Gilbert et al., 2009). Neglect in the early years may be the most damaging from the point of view of long-term mental health or social functioning…
Impact of neglect on children’s development
Neglect is rarely life threatening but has the potential to compromise a child’s development significantly, across multiple domains. Because neglect frequently coexists with other forms of maltreatment, it can be difficult to disentangle its unique consequences. Nevertheless, there is now a relatively robust consensus based on a range of empirical evidence that demonstrates its adverse impact on all the seven dimensions of development identified in the Assessment Framework: health, education, identity, emotional and behavioural development, family and social relationships, social presentation and self-care skills (see Tanner and Turney, 2003; Norman et al., 2012; Hildyard and Wolfe, 2002; Manly et al., 2001).
While neglect is thought to be particularly damaging in the first two to three years of life – a formative period for social, emotional and neurobiological development – it can compromise development throughout childhood and adolescence…
Persistent, severe neglect indicates a breakdown or a failure in the relationship between parent and child. This may be reflected in maladaptive attachment patterns; for example, neglected children are as likely as children maltreated in other ways to develop disorganised attachment styles (Barnett, Ganiban and Cicchetti, 1999). However, they differ from other maltreated children in that they show more evidence of delayed cognitive development, poor language skills, and poor social skills and coping abilities (Hildyard and Wolfe, 2002). They may also present as dependant and unhappy, and display a range of pathological behaviours (see Egeland et al, 1983; Ward, Brown and Westlake, 2012). Children who are neglected from early infancy may find that as their need for nurturing or responsive relationships goes ignored, they withdraw from relationships, feel a greater sense of failure and may even blame themselves for the neglect they experience (Manly et al, 2001).
Cumulative impact
The impact of neglect is not only widespread, affecting a wide range of developmental domains, it is also cumulative. Neglected infants and toddlers show a dramatic decline in overall developmental scores between the ages of 9 and 24 months (Egeland and Sroufe, 1981; Naughton et al, 2013). They also show a progressive decline in their cognitive function throughout the pre-school years (Strathearn et al, 2001). Neglected infants who initially display secure attachments increasingly develop insecure and disorganised attachment styles as they grow older (Howe, 2005). These findings imply that the longer pre-school children are exposed to neglect, the greater will be the harm. Longer duration of neglect has also been associated with an increased pattern of neural reactivity to social threat (McCrory et al., 2012). Hindley and colleagues’ systematic review of risk factors for the recurrence of maltreatment highlights the cumulative nature of neglect since it is the most likely form of maltreatment for a child to re-experience (Hindley et al, 2006).